Aug 20, 2009, 12:52 PM // 12:52
|
#1
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Niflheim
Profession: R/
|
CPU or RAM?
I'm going to do some minor PC upgrade. I'm pretty content of my GPU - 9800GT overclocked a bit, but my CPU and RAM are both pretty inferior - E2160 1.8GHz overclocked to 2.4GHz and Kingston 667MHz 2x1GB DDR2.
Which one would you recommend me to upgrade in the first order? CPU or RAM?
|
|
|
Aug 20, 2009, 01:23 PM // 13:23
|
#2
|
Jungle Guide
|
If the cache size of your E2160 isn't a problem, you should upgrade your memory.
|
|
|
Aug 20, 2009, 01:25 PM // 13:25
|
#3
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Guild: Omega Glory
Profession: Mo/
|
definitely your CPU first. You don't really need more than 2 GB and extra RAM speed will not help that much.
For games I would consider upgrading your graphics card though. I saw a GTX 285 (1 GB) by BFG for $280 on Bestbuy.com and probably you can find similar / better deals on Newegg.com as well.
|
|
|
Aug 20, 2009, 01:31 PM // 13:31
|
#4
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Niflheim
Profession: R/
|
GTX 285 would require also a change in power supply to at least a 600W, no? And the cheapest 285 in Poland costs 1200 PLN. That's twice as much as an E8400
I'll wait for one or two more responses from someone who doesn't recommend a 1GB GPU. And says that more than 2GB (in Windows 7) won't help.
|
|
|
Aug 20, 2009, 01:46 PM // 13:46
|
#5
|
La-Li-Lu-Le-Lo
|
Pick up some more (faster if your mobo supports it) RAM. E2160 is a good CPU, and if you wanted, you could OC it pretty far beyond 2.4GHz.
__________________
Stay Breezy
|
|
|
Aug 20, 2009, 02:04 PM // 14:04
|
#6
|
Jungle Guide
|
You'd be stupid to replace the E2160. End of story.
|
|
|
Aug 20, 2009, 02:53 PM // 14:53
|
#7
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Niflheim
Profession: R/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Theocrat
Pick up some more (faster if your mobo supports it) RAM. E2160 is a good CPU, and if you wanted, you could OC it pretty far beyond 2.4GHz.
|
Yeah, about that - my cousin (a dude that lives like a king thanks to his knowledge - my role model xd) has a E2140 which he overclocked to 2.67, meaning I would be easily able to overclock my CPU to 2.87.
The question is - how? When I tried overclocking to 2.45GHz, I had problems starting the computer. Maybe I was just unlucky and I'll have to try again. But are is there some kind of software that might help me?
Also, I'm not almost certain that I will be upgrading RAM - question is, which model? Kingston, Corsair, Kingston HyperX or something else? This is also a question about laptop RAM, because I will be changing my laptop's memory cause it sucks now, barely 512 RAM.
Oh, oh, and last question - if I have 4 RAM slots, should I sell my old 2x1GB sticks and buy a 2x2GB or get another 2x1GB set?
Quote:
You'd be stupid to replace the E2160. End of story.
|
Thanks for the advice, even if it's a bit blunt ;p
|
|
|
Aug 20, 2009, 03:03 PM // 15:03
|
#8
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Guild: I Will Never Join Your Guild (NTY)
Profession: R/
|
the E8400 is far better than your current CPU, even OC'd @ 2.4 it's still pretty out dated by current standards. Get the E8400 and OC it to 3.4 without too much trouble.... If you can swing it $$$ wise I'd suggest doubling your RAM too (for Win 7 or Vista at least).
|
|
|
Aug 20, 2009, 03:43 PM // 15:43
|
#9
|
Jungle Guide
|
E8400 is a superb chip; faster, great architecture, more instructions, expanded cache, high overclock potential. But replacing his E2160 for $170 USD isn't nearly as cost-practical as buying more and superior memory for $50 USD.
|
|
|
Aug 20, 2009, 03:52 PM // 15:52
|
#10
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Niflheim
Profession: R/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Fired Blank
E8400 is a superb chip; faster, great architecture, more instructions, expanded cache, high overclock potential. But replacing his E2160 for $170 USD isn't nearly as cost-practical as buying more and superior memory for $50 USD.
|
$170? I wish. It costs over $220 in Poland. And E8600 costs almost $350.
That's what I was asking about - which one will give me a better price:cash ratio, a new CPU or a new set of RAM.
Oh, like I asked before - what should I do with that RAM? I have 2x1GB, should I buy two more 1GB sticks, a 2GB stick (and use 3 sticks) or buy two 2x2GB and sell the old ones?
|
|
|
Aug 20, 2009, 03:58 PM // 15:58
|
#11
|
La-Li-Lu-Le-Lo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abedeus
Yeah, about that - my cousin (a dude that lives like a king thanks to his knowledge - my role model xd) has a E2140 which he overclocked to 2.67, meaning I would be easily able to overclock my CPU to 2.87.
The question is - how? When I tried overclocking to 2.45GHz, I had problems starting the computer. Maybe I was just unlucky and I'll have to try again. But are is there some kind of software that might help me?
|
I'm not the most experienced overclocker, nor do I know the details on the rest of your system, so I can't answer the "how", sadly. But I do know that you can push that CPU beyond even 2.87GHz. I know many people pushing 3.6GHz on air with E2160s, and higher is definitely possible with better cooling.
It's an absolutely fantastic cost/power CPU.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abedeus
Also, I'm not almost certain that I will be upgrading RAM - question is, which model? Kingston, Corsair, Kingston HyperX or something else? This is also a question about laptop RAM, because I will be changing my laptop's memory cause it sucks now, barely 512 RAM.
|
OCZ, Corsair, and G.Skill are the brands I'd personally recommend for their high quality and performance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abedeus
Oh, oh, and last question - if I have 4 RAM slots, should I sell my old 2x1GB sticks and buy a 2x2GB or get another 2x1GB set?
|
I'd ditch the current sticks and pick up new ones, just to be make absolutely sure all the timings match up.
Also:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Fired Blank
E8400 is a superb chip; faster, great architecture, more instructions, expanded cache, high overclock potential. But replacing his E2160 for $170 USD isn't nearly as cost-practical as buying more and superior memory for $50 USD.
|
I agree with this.
Picking up new RAM will be very much more cost effective than getting a new CPU.
__________________
Stay Breezy
|
|
|
Aug 20, 2009, 04:04 PM // 16:04
|
#12
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Niflheim
Profession: R/
|
Thanks for the help guys. As soon as I get allowance for this month (and next month) I should have enough money to get the new sticks.
|
|
|
Aug 20, 2009, 04:20 PM // 16:20
|
#13
|
Hell's Protector
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Canada
Guild: Brothers Disgruntled
|
1.8GHz is a bit slow by today's standards, but with the cpu clocked at 2.4gig, you won't actually get a whole lot better performance getting a faster Core 2. Even going to a quad core won't change that much since very few things actually utalize all 4 cores.
And, even though the RAM is only 667Mhz, a change to faster RAM also won't make that much difference and you already have 2 gigs.
So, you could go either way - cpu or RAM - at this point. The only upgrade that would make a serious improvement would involve a new motherboard, cpu, and RAM, such as an i7 or Phenom II.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abedeus
When I tried overclocking to 2.45GHz, I had problems starting the computer. Maybe I was just unlucky and I'll have to try again. But are is there some kind of software that might help me?
|
One thing that may overclockers overlook is the basic fact each individual CPU is different. Not every single sample of a particular model of cpu can be overclocked the same. Just because one person somewhere successfully OCs their cpu to a particular limit, does not mean that your particular cpu can go that far. It has to do with the various physical properties of the chip.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:21 AM // 02:21.
|